Talk:Gingoog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Gingoog is a very peaceful city, but I dont know why it is considered as first class city

Gingoog is not first class[edit]

yes you can never consider gingoog as an first class but for me it is the coolest city of all.

please try to know what first class city means before you would comment.........

--- Not a first class city to me. Peaceful yes! many called Gingoog city is a vacation city. The local government tried to introduce the city into it's neighboring cities through it's natural attractions and native characteristics. Unfortunately i been travelling a lot of places, Gingoog is not so well known place to date. Not until a remarkable event or physical attraction will rise. Department of tourism is trying to introduce Gingoog a lot by expressing it's natural wonder of natures. Waterfalls, rivers, mountains. etc.. But then i would suggest they will somehow put attention on other things the city has it's best capacities. - Linux - charro202@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.51.29.214 (talk) 05:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicerain123 (talk) 06:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC) Gingoog is a first class city based on the Income Classification of Philippine Cities <http://www.newsbreak.com.ph/democracyandgovernance/Income_Cities.html>. It is a first class city since 1982 <http://gingoog.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=32&Itemid=48>. Based on the 2005 revised classification,a city is considered first class if it has an annual income of at least 300,000,000. The city posted an income of 3 15,338,455.00 in year 2006. <http://www.newsbreak.com.ph/democracyandgovernance/IRA-Cities-%282006%29.html> The city's income is mostly generated from agriculture. Majority of the city is covered by agricultural lands may it be thousands of acres of coconut plantation, rice fields, vegetable plantations and fruits. It is currently considered the fruit basket of Region X. However, if you go to the city center, you only see few business establishments and small buildings compared to other Philippine cities. Hence, it is an agri-based city.[reply]

<Cityname> <City>[edit]

There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities. This may imminently affect the article name for Gingoog. For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented. Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion. If you wish to participate, please post your comments here. --JinJian (talk) 04:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

{{movenotice|Gingoog|Talk:Tacloban City#Requested move}}

Link Removal[edit]

Gary Dee 08:49, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gingoog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gingoog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gingoog&oldid=1212026635"