Talk:Gleek (Super Friends)

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comics: DC Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.
	This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Not original research[edit]

I don't know how "original research" really applies to Gleek's understanding of spoken English and strategic planning. He clearly does understand it. He has been shown able to lie (as when he vigorously shook his head when another of his kind -- a variation who spoke English -- identified him correctly as "the one they call Gleek," whereupon the accuser correctly called Gleek a liar), he has been shown to obey verbal commands, and even useful in planning (as when Wonder Woman told Gleek to distract Medusa and avoid looking into her eyes, both of which he accomplished successfully).

So, why does is stating that Gleek understands spoken English and can understand simple planning strategy "original research"? He has shown that he does!

It's about as much "original research" as saying that I can speak English and am literate. I'm writing this comment in English, therefore I am literate and can speak English, unless you really want to introduce the "million monkeys on a million typewriters" argument. PatrickLMT (talk) 16:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bucket power?[edit]

It seems in every episode Gleek's superpower was known as "bucket power", as he was able to immediately produce a bucket out of thin air to contain the transformed Zan. Is that worth putting on the page? 12.41.204.3 (talk) 21:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gleek's bucket usage is referenced nuetrally on the page... Lots42 (talk) 05:34, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wondertwinsross.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Wondertwinsross.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 June 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Wondertwinsross.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]