Talk:Glen Owen

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guido[edit]

Here's his 2018 appointment at Guido Fawkes. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:36, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Inaccurate description"[edit]

With regard to this recent IP deletion, with the edit summary "Removed inaccurate description of events related to AngelaRayner Article", exactly what is "inaccurate"? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Week of vile abuse[edit]

On 30 April Owen reported his "week of vile abuse at the hands of the Left's Twitter warriors" here in the Daily Mail. But I'm unable to find any secondary coverage in sources which are not banned/ blacklisted by Wikipedia. His article says, among much else: "Other messages were more serious. One post detected a ‘strong rapist energy’ coming from me, while another went to the opposite extreme by suggesting that I was an ‘incel’ – an involuntary celibate. I also apparently had ‘one of those Tory faces that you wouldn’t ever get tired of dropping an anvil on’." Martinevans123 (talk) 13:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More "ginger growlergate" commentary here from the famously erudite and impartial GB News. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion[edit]

Keep. This person is clearly notable. As far back as 2019 he was reported as "a senior and respected journalist", and recent events have led to him being called "the most evil man at Westminster, and possibly in Britain" (not entirely seriously - but still indicating notability). Coverage in multiple sources like this, this, this. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:42, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. At the heart of the reporting of at least two recent political controversies / "scandals". Martinevans123 (talk) 10:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]