Talk:Glynn, County Antrim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Glynn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 June 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


– This village is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC over the 11 other articles listed at Glynn (disambiguation).
Glynn County, Georgia has 40 times the population, and Glynn (surname) lists 29 people with the surname Glynn.
I can't find even one single notable person from the Antrim village: my Petscan search for biographical articles linking to Glynn found only a wrestler who had a match there and a lad whose father was a clergyman there. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 06:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. A search for sources (to support the text of this article and to confirm whether/if/what PRIMARTTOPIC might exist) suggests that there is no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Where that's the case, typically, the term should be the title of the disambiguation page... Guliolopez (talk) 11:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Glynn indicates that out of 299 incoming views in May, only the hatnote registered in the outgoing views, so even if those 21 outgoing clickstreams are an apparent minority (~7%), this is an apparent dead end for navigation otherwise and we should try this change to see if the outcome is an improvement. --Joy (talk) 16:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nomination, 64.229.90.172, Guliolopez and per comment by Joy. WP:NOPRIMARYTOPIC indeed. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 21:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. No clear primary topic for this title. Paintspot Infez (talk) 05:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support no clear primary topic for the single word, many of the other uses may derive from it but the Cornish one probably doesn't. Views[[1]] doesn't show a clear primary topic, this one has 263, the Louisiana one has 38, the surname has 35 and the Cornish one has 4 but Glynn County, Georgia has 1,726 though its not a full match. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.