Talk:Godskitchen

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rave, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.RaveWikipedia:WikiProject RaveTemplate:WikiProject RaveRave articles

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV- Reads like an advert[edit]

Lines like "At the end of 2009 Godskitchen remains the world’s leading electronic music brand, ever associated with quality events, the best production and exhilarating shows, the brand continues to grow, entering new markets and returning to old favourites." and "Godskitchen has evolved into the world’s most influential dance institution rising to become the premier dance brand on the planet." sound more like poor advertising talk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.219.133.243 (talk) 13:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah awful, I originally wrote the godskitchen article in 2005 and I`m very disspointed to see it ruined in such a blatant promotional fashion. If there is an archive of the original flying around anywhere I would be more than happy to use it to rewrite the article, I would of course include any new RELEVANT information that has been subsequently added. I do honestly believe that this organisation does warrant note as it has made a significant contribution to the UK and international music industry, however, I am also of the opinion that the article does now appear very biase and promotional SteveSircull (talk) 12:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have the archive pulled up, and could revert it, however, I don't even know if I want to. I'm not used to this whole idea of being bold and such. Anyone want to offer their advice? Legoland12342 (talk) 18:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of being bold for you. Consider it reverted. 86.2.118.52 (talk) 03:56, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Godskitchen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724223247/http://www.skiddle.com/whats-on/Leeds/Mission/GODSKITCHEN-LEEDS/11223738/ to http://www.skiddle.com/whats-on/Leeds/Mission/GODSKITCHEN-LEEDS/11223738/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]