Talk:GoldWave

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 February 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Professional sound production Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GoldWave is now a victim of CDRWin-ish name stealing :( [1] versus [2] (eyeroll) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.3.198.245 (talk) 19:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck does that mean? 98.202.38.225 (talk) 21:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ocean Eyes is not Owl City's debut album...Maybe I'm Dreaming is. rglee98 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:19, 10 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Done added major label debut ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 23:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV anyone?[edit]

It looks like fine software, but this is an ad, not encyclopedic info. "The software has continued to improve over the past 20 years and is considered one of the best available today." -- gimme a break... 98.229.4.47 (talk)burgo —Preceding undated comment added 05:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that history section is really claque-o-ragous. (I know. That's not really a word, but it makes my point.) I will remove the history section. 159.83.54.2 (talk) 00:29, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong link[edit]

The name given under "original author(s)" links to a completely different person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.108.55.24 (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Geniac (talk) 06:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]