Talk:Goole A.F.C.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Goole AFC Forum[edit]

The idea that the Goole AFC Forum has been deleted from the main page is that it is a passworded page which means it is not accessible for all Goole AFC supporters, until it becomes open to all it shall stay deleted, constantly reverting of this will lead to Warnings for Vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kewstu (talkcontribs) 20:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you well know, Goole AFC Forum is no longer password protected and is free for all to view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by For the good of the club (talkcontribs) 10:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is still a forum site which fails the external links policy also I suspect a conflict of interest here and so point you at Conflict of interest policy. Keith D (talk) 14:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GOOLE AFC LINKS[edit]

Now this is getting a little pathetic all round, you either can have links to websites to do with GOOLE AFC all in or you can have none external links policy, with the reason been all unoffical websites are a conflict of interest Conflict of interest policy. Please discuss this here and lets make a rational adult decision between us. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kewstu (talkcontribs) 16:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the webmaster of that site you should not be adding an external link to it - Is that correct or incorrect? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.55.94 (talk) 11:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, why have many other wikipedia sites for other Unibond League Clubs have external links to Forums but this is not allowed on this site - one rule for one and one for another! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.55.94 (talk) 11:10, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop warring over the external links on the article the large number of changes to these over the last couple of weeks is not good. Please improve the article content and forget about the external links. As stated previously there should not be a forum link, probably other articles need to be looked at but please do not go round removing links from other articles just to make a point. Keith D (talk) 11:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Goole A.F.C./Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Requires photographs
  2. Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
  3. Requires copy edit for WP:MOS
Keith D (talk) 00:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 00:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 16:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Goole A.F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]