Talk:Gosau Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gosau Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paleobiota[edit]

@Tisquesusa: The paleobiota section is entirely unnecessary, while the list superficially looks substantial, most of the taxa are simply junior synonyms of Struthiosaurus, The contents of the paleobiota were simply the weishampel contents of the paleobiota of the Grünbach Formation, which I created, and which is essentially complete. Do you want to help me in expanding the Gosau Group article from the german wikipedia? Hemiauchenia (talk) 12:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemiauchenia: I do want to help, but I don't have much time unfortunately. Ok, I see the point, but now the article looks nicer because the table fills the white space that would be there. And even if most are junior synonyms, I think it is useful to highlight them, also because they may be reclassified in the future and we would have to do the work all over again, or rescue the history. I think it would be good to start with the basins to list the correct stratigraphies in the different sub-basins and areas, like for instance Golfo San Jorge Basin. Tisquesusa (talk) 14:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]