Talk:Graeme Harper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources[edit]

I was gonna translate this to Norwegian and I noticed that a lot of the information is sourced from a book by Adrian Rigelsford. It seems like he shouldn't be considered a reliabe source. I was wondering if the cites should be replaced with another and more reliable source. Davhorn (talk) 21:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think in this case it can be taken as reliable for two reasons. 1) The book was basically a long interview with Harper, so the source was Harper rather than Rigelsford's own research, and 2) Harper has collaborated on another book with Rigelsford since then (his one about the new series, published last year), so can't have been too unhappy with anything Rigelsford did. Angmering (talk) 20:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Birthplace[edit]

The infobox says he was born in St Albans. The first section says he was born in London. They can't both be right! Unless there's a source than can definitively establish which is right, both will have to re removed The- (talk) 23:55, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Graeme Harper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]