Talk:Greenlee Partners

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

db-corp[edit]

This isn't eligible for speedy deletion because it does assert notability and that notability is supported by refs.--Blargh29 (talk) 03:41, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two of the refs are not independant of the source. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:52, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then go for AFD, cause notability is asserted.-Blargh29 (talk) 04:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prod[edit]

I have removed the prods because I have expanded coverage of the firm's history, two of the firm's major lobbying successes, and included references of articles from major Pennsylvania newspapers that attest to the firm's influence within Pennsylvania government.--Blargh29 (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The prods also mentioned serious POV issues, which have not been addressed. Hairhorn (talk) 02:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a quick attempt at taking out some of the more outlandishly biased claims (eg: calling them the "gold standard"). Hairhorn (talk) 16:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a quote from the Pennsylvania Report with its description of the firm. I have also added a cite to show that the "Harrisburg Online" has been cited in the mainstream media. These are both appropriate under WP:V and WP:NPOV.--Blargh29 (talk) 00:06, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Greenlee Partners. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711124841/http://www.greenleepartners.com/professionals.htm to http://www.greenleepartners.com/professionals.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pa-report.com/uploaded_pdf/PA%20Report%20100%20-%20Jan%2023%2C%202009.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.legis.state.pa.us/wu01/li/mi/lobby/NAMES/EWANCO_ROBERT_J.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Greenlee Partners. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whitewashing lobbying efforts[edit]

A newly created account has been removing sourced content from the lobbying history section. I have no personal attachment to the subject, except I do not think removing sourced content is beneficial. I leave this as a placeholder for more involved editors to comment. Ifnord (talk) 18:52, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]