Talk:Greensted

I have changed the word 'village' to hamlet. Does anyone mind? I hope not.

The case for 'hamlet': The nearest pub closed down many years ago. There are no shops (and the shop in nearby Toot Hill closed down many years ago). For my money, if Greensted was ever a village, it no longer justifies the moniker. Indeed, it is probably on account of the smallness of the place that the church endured, while citizens of more populous settlements replaced their old churches with 'posh stone numbers' during the sheep / cloth boom of the late Medieval period and / or during the industrialisation driven boom of the nineteenth century (when indeed Greensted's own church benefitted from a level of 'restoration' that wise ones from subsequent generations have deemed of dubious merit).

Also the adverb 'commonly' turned up three times. I have replaced two of the three simply because I found it repetitive. I hope whoever put it there doesn't mind: if you do, put it back!

While in pedantic mode, I'm not sure that Greensted's status as the oldest wooden church in the world is unchallenged, for instance in Norway.... The discrete use in this context of the word 'commonly' seems to me abundantly appropriate, therefore, but I changed the caption appearing under the picture. I also see that I replaced the picture because the old one was automatically removed by a censoring-robot that objected to the copyright attribution that had been given it. But I make no claim of superiority for 'my' picture. Please do feel free to put back yours, espcially if you have time and patience to navigate Wikipedia's copyright declaration requirements (or else to keep on putting it back every week or so...).

Charles01 12:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry - I've changed it back to village - because the definition of a hamlet is a village without a church; Greensted is therefore a village not a hamlet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.150.39 (talk) 20:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greensted. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071123042024/http://www.greensted.net/ to http://www.greensted.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)