Talk:Greenville Symphony Orchestra

United States: South Carolina Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in South Carolina may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Copyvio[edit]

Hey, the edits look good so far. The second paragraph is really close to the text found at the GSO website. If that text were published in mainspace, the article would most likely be deleted as a copyright violation. You might want to rewrite it in your own words. You may have planned to but I just wanted to make sure. OlYeller^Talktome 15:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On further inspection, it looks like most of it is copied from the GSO website. We just need to make sure it's changed before we post it. OlYeller^Talktome 15:18, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simply changing words is still a copyright violation and a rather devious one at that. I suggest reading a paragraph, deleting it, then rewriting it from memory. OlYeller^Talktome 20:11, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have any more news articles about the symphony? Notability is still a little shaky. OlYeller^Talktome 15:58, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

This Google News search and This Google News Archive search may provide more references. OlYeller^Talktome 13:53, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance Tags[edit]

I placed three tags on the article (refimprove, orphan, and wikify). I placed the refimprove tag because there's a lot of info on the article that I'm sure is true but can easily be verified by adding more references (help with references for the article can be found in the section above). I placed the orphan tag because there's only one article that links to this one (less than 3 makes it an oprhan). I placed the Wikify template but it could be easily replaced with the cleanup tag in this case. The references could be wikified and sections could be split up or rewritten to be a little cleaner. The wikify template is pretty weak but the work is there as the article isn't 'perfect'. OlYeller^Talktome 15:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greenville Symphony Orchestra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120227114033/http://www.gvillemag.com/feature/g_profile/edvard_tchivzhel to http://www.gvillemag.com/feature/g_profile/edvard_tchivzhel

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]