Talk:Greg Hicks

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cleanup[edit]

Please provide a message as to what you want improved. Especially provide evidence as to what p[art of the article has neutrality problems. This is a stub and mentions very little about this actors career. MarnetteD | Talk 21:49, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uh... I have to strongly disagree there. The entire article is about the individual's achievements, appearances, etc. It's overcoverage, and there's very little encyclopaedic coverage; it's not far off from being purely promotional. On top of that, there are no actual references, only a couple of external links at the end. As for copyediting, the article's content is disjointed and poorly worded, split into excessive simple sentences and paragraphs, and overall needs a cleanup. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 21:52, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you are not going to assist with any of the copyediting. What else would you have on an actors page then their performances and awards. This is actually par for the course for virtually every actor page on wikipeida. This looks much more like someone being trying to make a point. MarnetteD | Talk 21:58, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a problem with my behaviour, WP:WQA is thataway. I have helped with the article by pointing out issues which need resolving. I will stop by and clean it up a bit if and when I get chance. I am a volunteer like everyone else, and do not intend to rush to take on the whole job of cleaning up this poorly-written article myself because you feel like making borderline personal attacks. I suggest discussing how to improve the article, not commenting on my choice of editing. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 22:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the neutrality of the article is disputed, we need information about what point of view (covered in secondary sources) is not currently represented in the article, to balance out those areas that you (or anyone else) feel are covered excessively. The only expressed concern is that it's "purely promotional" - well, if secondary sources only have positive things to say then that's what will be in the article. Such things could be thinned out if they excessively dominate the article, or re-written if they use an overly promotional tone (which at present, they don't - in my opinion.) I am going to remove the neutrality dispute template unless there is some indication of something to dispute about.

I am going to remove the unreferenced template because the article has at least some references from reliable secondary sources.

I am going to remove the copy editing template because there appear to be no spelling or grammatical errors and nothing glaringly problematical about the style used. If there is an issue with how the article is phrased or presented, then any editor can go ahead and fix that.

--Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added an advert tag instead, since that more accurately represents my concerns than npov. The article reads more like a CV than an encyclopaedic article, and more information is required than simply a list of the individual's achievements, appearances, and personal hobbies (all of which would appear in a CV). GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 16:29, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is exactly like 100's, if not 1000's of other articles for actors here on Wikipedia. Could you please direct us to an actor article that you feel meets the criteria that you are setting for this one. Thanks ahead of time for your help in this matter. MarnetteD | Talk 16:47, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greg Hicks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101027062402/http://www.rsc.org.uk/about-us/ensemble/ensemble-biog-greg-hicks.aspx to http://www.rsc.org.uk/about-us/ensemble/ensemble-biog-greg-hicks.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:48, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]