Talk:Grindelwald

The first picture reading "Grindelwald and Eiger" is, in fact, Grindelwald and Wetterstein. It is the wrong mountain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.129.243.60 (talk) 19:43, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion the three words "Eiger North Face" should appear in the introduction. If someone has no knowledge about the Alps and Switzerland they probably don't know Grindelwald. But they most likely know "the North Face". Grindelwald is THE destination if you want to see the face, no? Sure this isn't WikiTravel, but the article sounds like it was written by a bureaucrat, frankly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1205:34DD:6C80:1293:E9FF:FE0A:2F58 (talk) 22:38, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The railway line diagram of the WAB contains several errors:

In the Grindelwald station, there is no connection between the WAB and the BOB line to Zweilütschinen. The two railways share the station, but are not linked (actually, the WAB has 800mm gauge, the BOB has 1000mm)
Grindelwald Grund is not a triangular station. The trains from Grindelwald to Kleine Scheidegg must change the direction here. There is no through rail.
Grindelwald Grund should be located on the left side of the line, not on the right.
At Kleine Scheidegg, there IS a triangular station. The rails from Grindelwald just go straight ahead in direction Wengen. However, there is a triangle which is used to turn the trains around since the locomotives should always be on the valley side of the train (i.e. in direction Grindelwald or Wengen)
The attached Jungfraubahn at Kleine Scheidegg should be placed on the left side

Unfortunately, I am not experienced enough to do this modification. I hope that someone with more knowledge can do this. --TracksOnWax (talk) 21:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done --TracksOnWax (talk) 20:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the media (Gran Turismo 2, Grindelwald track)[edit]

I remember that the Playstation 1 racing game Gran Turismo 2 had a track called Grindelwald. I'm unsure if it was modelled on actual roads in the area or completely fictional. Does anybody know anything about it? 85.230.104.22 (talk) 10:34, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is fictional, but based on the Grindelwald. However, I agree to write about it in the Grindelwald article. Because I think it is notable and it makes many people know about Grindelwald. http://gran-turismo.wikia.com/wiki/Grindelwald --Love Krittaya (talk) 17:06, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Residents[edit]

Richard Wagner is listed as a resident of Grindelwald, but no documentation is provided or cited. No mention of Grindelwald is made in the linked biographical entry for Wagner. What basis is there for this listing? Mchuston (talk) 18:23, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Climate[edit]

All you have on "climate" is precipitation. Nothing on temperature?
--Atikokan (talk) 00:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the source for precipitation doesn't have any temperature data and neither does weatherbase.Tobyc75 (talk) 11:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Grindelwald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]