Talk:Gutenberg (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move 30 October 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Clear consesus. (non-admin closure) comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gutenberg → Gutenberg (disambiguation) – Johannes Gutenberg is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for Gutenberg. Sharper {talk} 12:19, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support, of course. Good nom, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:22, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The Gutenberg Bible is also a potential primary topic. It recieves less views than Gutenberg himself, but not by much, relatively speaking - at times their view counts are almost the same._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Interesting take that I hadn't considered. My interpretation of WP:PARTIAL, however, is that Gutenberg Bible would only really belong on the Gutenberg dab page in the first place if it was commonly referred to as "Gutenberg" (or "the Gutenberg") – which I haven't heard before, but I suppose I can see that being within the realm of reason. Should somebody looking for the Gutenberg Bible expect to find that by simply typing "Gutenberg" though? Sharper {talk} 21:51, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think it's enough to assume that someone typing "Gutenberg" may not want the person the majority of the time. The Gutenberg Bible is also a massively well known historical artifact and may be where some people even found out about Gutenberg himself._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 05:06, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning support given the apparent absence of any other articles that compete for primariness. As Sharper says, I don't think the bible is commonly referred to as just "Gutenberg". I have heard Project Gutenberg referred to as "Gutenberg" in informal contexts, but I think readers seeking information on the project are very likely to use the full name (also, it gets a little under half the views of Johannes - pageviews). But if there's doubt, it would be a simple matter to set up a WP:DABTEST to measure what % of visitors to this dab page click through to Johannes. Colin M (talk) 16:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Colin M. Gutenberg Bible is a partial title match, not a primary topic. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Johannes is also a PTM. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.