Talk:Gwinhurst, Delaware

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources[edit]

APatcher 17 Feb 2007

I will need time to write proper citations.

Stub[edit]

This article is a stub.

APatcher 05:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Claymont[edit]

Gwinhurst is not in Claymont and the population of Gwinhurst is not included in the demographics of Claymont, DE 69.141.161.237 (talk) 23:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, revert to [1]? --M4gnum0n (talk) 13:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration of article[edit]

I've restored the article for the following reasons:

  • Deletion was based on a claim of nonnotability per a proposed guideline that violates longstanding consensus. Unless this guideline gets consensus down the road, it has no basis for authority, and this community should be treated as any other.
  • This proposal was used because there are virtually no sources that mention the community. I've added an in-depth source that is perhaps more significant than anything else already on the article. Another source would be DeLorme's Maryland/Delaware Atlas & Gazetteer, which has detailed maps of Gwinhurst and other parts of the nearby area; I don't own it myself, but I'm familiar enough with the series that I know that it will be helpful.
  • Participants in the deletion discussion referred to Gwinhurst as a neighborhood. It is not a neighborhood but a separate unincorporated community (see the GNIS reference), so this designation (which would reasonably lead to a redirect) is in error.

Nyttend (talk) 11:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The source provided does not establish notability. Every neighborhood is listed as a "populated place", which does not make every neighborhood notable. Being listed in an atlas does not meet the standards for notability either. I'm relisting this article. Gwinhurst is absolutely a neighborhood. I grew up in it. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 21:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How many times do I have to show you that being an unincorporated community has long been viewed as sufficient for notability? Nyttend (talk) 22:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Compare, for instance, the following:

Guess which ones have wikipedia articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.116.170.177 (talk) 21:58, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I miss your point. Nyttend (talk) 22:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think I understand. Bad argument, but right conclusion. The Ardens, Bellefonte, Claymont, and Edgemoor are legitimate communities in the Brandywine Hundred, whether as incorporated villages/towns, or unincorporated census designated places (each with multiple neighborhoods/subdivisions/developments within them). Carrcroft and Gwinhurst, though long established places, have no other designation than "neighborhood", and shouldn't be thought of as distinct "communities" for the purposes of wikipedia. It's not your knowledge of Wikipedia's policies and practices that I'm calling into question, but your understanding of the geography of Brandywine Hundred. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 01:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Gwinhurst is not just a neighborhood. It is incorporated, but only as a civic subdivision. Gwinhurst is a clearly defined community in New Castle County, Delaware with clearly definable borders that have been marked by certified surveyors. It is a subdivision of the County. It is a municipal entity that has powers to govern in certain local matters. 74.103.182.239 (talk) 06:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gwinhurst, Delaware. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]