Talk:H. S. Bhabra

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on H. S. Bhabra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928000137/http://www.academy.ca/hist/history.cfm?categid=300170&shownum=16&winonly=0&awards=3&rtype=5&curstep=4 to http://www.academy.ca/hist/history.cfm?categid=300170&shownum=16&winonly=0&awards=3&rtype=5&curstep=4
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930095343/http://brannan.org/2000/bhabra.html to http://brannan.org/2000/bhabra.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051126141213/http://www.ryerson.ca/library/events/asian_heritage/bhabra.html to http://www.ryerson.ca/library/events/asian_heritage/bhabra.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Too positive?

I came across the H. S. Bhabra article after reading Marni Jackson's account of how he harassed her. She compared him to Jian Ghomeshi, and the article from Saturday Night confirms elements of her account.

I was struck by how positive the article was, making very little mention of Bhabra's weaknesses.

Everyone at Imprint apparently assumed he had drafted the poison pen letters.

Jackson wrote that other women told her, after his suicide, that he had harrassed them too.

Bhabra's suicide note acknowledged he had deceived everyone over his visa status.

I want to be fair to his surviving relatives, and to be neutral, while still adequately covering his well documented weaknesses. In its current state the article does not seem neutrally written to me. It seems too much like a hagiography. Geo Swan (talk) 12:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)