Talk:HLA-B47

Confusing[edit]

As with several of the other serotype articles, I have added a tag to urge the authors to please explain difficult terminology so that the articles are understandable to a non-specialist. — Brian (talk) 22:23, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The tag has been removed as the page properly links to pages that give adequate background information.Pdeitiker 23:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks are not an excuse for confusing writing. I'm not sure why you seem so reluctant to make this article (and other serotype articles) understandable to lay readers. — Brian (talk) 23:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not reluctant, you haven't given the slightest clue as to what you think needs to be explained.Pdeitiker 01:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a two-way street. There are many articles that I have found weak and I have gone out and done some research and made specific comments on the discussion page, and that is where I put them, I generally don't deface main-pages without a very good reason, I consider it rude, your statements are more or less pedantic. Its OK to ask a question, what does this mean? That generally get the ball rolling. Ask a question or make a statement that can be addressed.

For an example of what I think needs clarification, see Talk:HLA-B53. The same concrns apply to all of these serotype articles. And I ask you to assume good faith and not accuse me of "defacing" the article. I sincerely think it is confusing and unreadable by anyone but a specialist, and this is a problem I would like to see addressed. — Brian (talk) 01:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As an example of the kind of explaining I think these articles need to give, I tried to edit HLA-B47, but I didn't even know where to begin. Reading the lead paragraph leaves me with few clues about what is being talked about. I followed the links, and they shed little light on things. I am not saying this to harp on the article; rather, I just wanted to say that I have made a good-faith effort to clarify the article, but I am incapable of comprehending it in order to do so. — Brian (talk) 01:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HLA-B47. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070821210135/http://www.gene.ucl.ac.uk/nomenclature/data/get_data.php?hgnc_id=4932 to http://www.gene.ucl.ac.uk/nomenclature/data/get_data.php?hgnc_id=4932

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]