Talk:HMS Rose (1757)

A fact from HMS Rose (1757) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 September 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the anti-smuggling activities of the British frigate HMS Rose in 1775, provoked the Rhode Island government to commission the first warship, the Sloop-of-war Providence, in what became the U.S. Navy?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/September.

Wikipedia

Military history: Maritime / British / European / Early Modern / American Revolution

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

There is a second page about HMS Suprise where it is the Maritime Musem Display. We might consider referencing the other ariticle. RUFTed Rufus Ross 03:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is referenced in the Replica section of the article. Dabbler 11:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMS Rose (1757). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051207022418/http://www.tallshiprose.org/info/history.html to http://www.tallshiprose.org/info/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added cannon/anchor find by the United States Army Corps of Engineers[edit]

Wikipedia didn't like the Daily Mail article I originally wanted to cite, so I used a cite from WSB-TV instead. I searched the USACE site, but couldn't find anything about the find. If anyone can find the USACE press release or a better source, please add it, as it will be preferable to a pop culture citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grifterlake (talk • contribs) 05:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]