While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
It is utterly incomprehensible to me how one editor has the ability to hijack so many articles by pasting "neutrality disputed" on top of them with a completely nonsensical reason as happened in this case. To state that naming the victims gives them "undue weight" is not only callous but I fail to see how 40-odd words in a 500-odd word article can give anything "undue weight". I agree that the names and ages of the victims are not necessary in an encyclopaedic article and that the perpetrators of these kinds of barbarities need to be exposed to the maximum extent possible but an encyclopaedia is perhaps not the ideal medium for this. Regardless, it is clear to me from this user's past edit history here and on other WP editions that that is unlikely to be his motive anyways. Rather, it is much more likely that minimizing the exposure of the existence of anti-Israeli terrorism is this user's intent.
I suggest that these hideous tags be removed as soon as possible by a more responsible editor.
Long time not seen, Kalsermar, now you are gonna poke the fire up here with your pro-Israel-POV and ad hominem attacks? I like to have the articles neutral, not pro-whatsoever. At least the author could use the same visual presentation for perpetrator and victims. (and that also counts for the other disputed articles)... Night of the Big Windtalk 21:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed! Hey, how is it going over here?
Let's get to the issue at hand ok? For the benefit of others at least. Let's see....I mention the hijacking of articles with "neutrality disputed" tags. Also, I talk about "undue weight" and numbers of words of certain sections compared to the overall article and I agree with you, agree mind you, that the names of the victims are not entirely necessary in an encyclopaedic article. What do you do? Well, you accuse me of Pro-Israel POV of course! Tellingly, and as per usual, the exact nature of my so called "Pro-Israel POV" is not mentioned. When it comes to POV, "(m)ethinks thou dost protest too much!"
I'll make it easy on you though.... point out one instance of inaccurate pro-Israeli POV on this en:wp (or the Dutch one for that matter!) where I jeopardized the integrity of an encyclopaedic article and where my position was not ultimately proven to be consistent with Wikipedia guidelines or the general consensus and I'll support you in this one all the way!
I agree, this is utterly absurd. Complaining about "undue weight to the victims" and then dodging questions by answering the article requires a "complete rewrite". Yeah right. Kalsermar, feel free to remove the tag, this is simply a case of Wikipedia:Tag bombing. Unjustified tag bombing is a form of disruptive editing. Editors who engage in tag bombing after being asked to stop may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Marokwitz (talk) 19:21, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
