Talk:Ham Castle

Military history: Fortifications / British / European B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

PD source[edit]

English Heritage. "Worcestershire and Worcester City HER: Motte and Bailey at Homme (Ham) Castle, Clifton-on-Teme (HER Reference: WSM00284)". Heritage Gateway. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)

The English Heritage source above includes a text copied from

William Page; J.W. Willis-Bund (1924). The Victoria history of the county of Worcester. Vol. 4. pp. 426–7.

Page died in 1934 and Willis-Bund in 1928. As it seems that the author of the paragraph is anonymous, So under the UK copyright legislation which is for a copyright period that extends to 70 years after the death of the author (Fact sheet P-01: UK Copyright Law), and that English Heritage copied the text without attrition I think that it is safe to assume that the copy right on this text has expired, and that copying this text verbatim and then changing it is not a breach of copyright. If you read this and do not agree with my assumption, then please delete the text and then let me know so that we can discuss it further. -- PBS (talk) 16:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PBS, from a UK perspective, that sounds sensible; anything written by Page or Willis-Bund is going to be out of copyright. For the Wiki, it would also need to be out of copyright in the US as well; that's a bit trickier, as you'll need to check some of the formalities. I think the chart here covers it; it may still be in copyright in the US according to that chart, depending on what the publishers did. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:50, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have had a look at the chart, and I am not sure. I'll leave it to others to decide. -- PBS (talk) 17:04, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't blame you - US law is notoriously awkward in this area! Hchc2009 (talk) 17:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]