Talk:Hamartiology
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page: • Christian views on sin Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Christian views on sin Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the Hamartiology page were merged into Christian views on sin on 27 September 2019 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Connecting this entry with systematic theology[edit]
It is important to connect this discipline as a component of dogmatic or systematic theology.--Drboisclair 18:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
POV[edit]
This comes across as very much pro the original sin school of thought, though much of the article is unsubstantiated. 79.70.189.40 (talk) 12:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- mmm hmm. You wanted salvation from academics, or from sin? Note the Pelagian view, in which the Fall of Adam "established a negative moral precedent" for humanity, but few modern religious philosophers or 'theologians' subscribe to this point of view (POV) " and no orthodox theologians...continue to hold this hamartiological viewpoint." MaynardClark (talk) 12:51, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Original blessing[edit]
Does the Pelagian view really say that people are born as blank slates? I thought it said that people were born good, similar to the "Original Blessing" view of Matthew Fox (priest). Vorbee (talk) 17:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)