Talk:Hampton House (Chicago)

Hampton House (Chicago) was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 14, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Failed GA[edit]

Article is unreferenced. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 23:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, what's the difference between "notes" and "reference"?Wooyi 23:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two references/notes does not a GA make. You can do better. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 23:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "Adjacent Park" Section[edit]

I am removing the Adjacent Park section. The park itself would be a tangental subject which could just be referenced with a link, the same goes for Harold Washington. This sections however does not actually discuss the park or Harold Washington. It discusses the birds in the park and their connection to Harold Washington. To read about birds in the park, visit the link about the park, or read a page about parakeet monks in general (chicago is mentioned). To learn about Harold Washington's relationship to the birds, read the Harold Washington page. The birds are completely tangental to this building.

The final paragraph of this section seems to have been intended to complete the previous section about Recent History. I will leave this paragraph there, however, it needs to be completely rewritten, and perhaps removed as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edy52285 (talk • contribs) 08:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]