Talk:Hard Times (Paramore song)

Hard Times (Paramore song) was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 3, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hard Times (Paramore song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 12:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coming soon!

Overall GA review[edit]

This article is nowhere near GA material.
It's missing a commercial performance section same can be said about a credits and personnel section.
No external links for the lyrics of the song, for example.
References are not well formatted. Example: Pitchfork, NPR has no work, missing dates of publication in most sources, as well as, authors missing.
The NYT source has valuable information (meaning of the lyrics) that is not used.
The lead is nowhere near what's requested.
Live performances are not mentioned here.

@Kokoro20: It seems to me that you put no effort in making this article shining, to be honest. We have two options, either you will work hard over the next seven days to make this shine or I'm going to have to fail this, what is it gonna be? MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:06, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll tell you something Mario, I've been keeping an eye on this article and Kokoro hasn't been very active recently; his edits have mostly been vandalism reverts and keeping the watchlist safe. I also compared this to my only song GA and thought this article was awfully short. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 00:52, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been very active lately, because I haven't been in much of a Wikipedia mood, and I've been busy elsewhere. But I'll try and see what I can do with the article within that week. If not, then go ahead and fail this, and I may try again later. Kokoro20 (talk) 10:44, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, noticed. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]