Talk:Hard landing

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

"A helicopter can often return to the ground after engine failure more safely than a fixed-wing aircraft provided that the rotor(s) are still intact and free to turn."

This statement is false, as fixed-wing aircraft exhibit well-defined and controllable gliding principals in the event of an engine failure, and much pilot training time is devoted to a mastery of this concept.

Ryanair reference[edit]

The reference to support Ryanair's 'reputation' is a blog that has zero supporting data, just that 'People have complained a lot' about Ryanair. While the blogger is entitled to his views, this is not a high quality source. Please note I have no affiliation or connection (or shares) in Ryanair. 80.41.92.9 (talk) 19:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]