Talk:Helen L. Smits

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Eb5406a Jada.barrett Isabellahinds really really great work so far with this. Honestly my biggest question mark is using her own words might be a red flag. Are there other publications that you can cite so that you don't have to cite her? This especially in sections not marked "research" but possibly also there (and you're missing a citation at the end there) --- basically we want to think about the bias question for this -- it's less likely to be biased if it's coming from someone else and therefore more likely accurate. When you're representing her research it's more straightforward and contained bc it's her research you're talking about so it makes sense to quote it at least a little. Also the lead should give us a bit more. It's OK if there's some repetition farther down. encyclopedic writing should keep in mind the fast reader and skimmer - how can you condense all the most important bits into the lead? At least her job titles... --Liliput000 (talk) 02:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2021 and 26 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Eb5406a, Jada.barrett, Isabellahinds. Peer reviewers: Taylormapstone, KhushiRamnani, Nicolecmerhi, Jt5826a.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

Hey! I have added it to the peer review article so it should be available now! I was really impressed with your efforts and writing, look forward to reading your finalized version!