This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Work oneself or just critize and expect others to do the work?[edit]
What we do here is to write and improve articles acording to the rules of Wikipedia. We work for free, we work together. In this case e. g. it takes the same time to add the word Poland or the remark [disambiguation needed]. What do you think is the better way to act? Which has the bigger advantage? So why does he not edit for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling himself instead of expecting others to do it? I don't understand this behaviour. It's to do research, write and improve, not to delegate this. --Leo067 (talk) 11:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
