This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Whose "B"? is the real question. One wonders in what cultural context an assessment of "low priority" is rendered, doubtless after great consideration. Is the context "European culture since the Renaissance". Or is it "Neo-Palladianism in Great Britain? To be perfectly honest, shouldn't Henry Flitcroft really be rated "uncool"? One wonders, would the flagger here hesitate for a moment before tagging an opinion in an architecture article WP:NPOV?--Wetman 00:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming that your "real question" is just that, my answer would be the steps listed in the "easy steps" above are not complete and this scale. As to priority, I agree that a change is needed. The guideline I see is High: Must have had a large impact in their main discipline, across a couple of generations. Had some impact outside their country of origin. Mid: Important in their discipline. I will change it to Mid as the article makes no claim to impact outside of his country of origin. Is some further change in order? --KenWalker | Talk 01:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
