Talk:Herr Christ, der einge Gottessohn, BWV 96/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


My last one, I promise JAGUAR  22:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "adding sparkle by a "dancing" soprano" - sparkle?
    "Bach performed the cantata again in later years" - any exact date?
    "The Gospel asks how Jesus" - gospel isn't capitalised in the lead
    "John Eliot Gardiner, who conducted in 2000 the Bach Cantata Pilgrimage and conducted this cantata" - a bit choppy due to repetition of "conducted"
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

This article has been exceptionally good. I couldn't find anything worthy of putting this on hold, well done! JAGUAR  16:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]