Talk:Hifz-ur-Rehman

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 April 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Jack Greenmaven, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on May 20, 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Untitled[edit]

This man is history and Should be covered by wikipedia. Everything mentioned in the page is authenticate

This may be true, but you need to prove it by supplying reliable references. See WP:REF. --Greenmaven (talk) 08:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Naming the man[edit]

There is more than one spelling of the man's name; a standard version should be used throughout. Preferably the one used as the title of the article. I will not change it in case I am mistaken. Also the word 'Maulana' seems to be a title, which is confusing to readers outside Pakistan, and needs to be explained. At first it appears to be a name of a new person being discussed. Since there are no references, I will begin by adding one explaining 'Maulana', which other editors will be able to improve upon. --Greenmaven (talk) 08:18, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Greenmaven, thanks for your comments. Given that "Maulana" is no longer used in the article (which I edited as per Wikipedia WP:MOSISLAM guidelines), there's no need to provide an explanation. The spelling of the writer's name as Hifz-ur-Rehman is an eminently acceptable English transliteration (others would be equally acceptable, but let's stick to one). Best wishes.GorgeCustersSabre (talk) 13:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine with me. Just trying to help with consistency. --Greenmaven (talk) 04:33, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Greenmaven, thanks again. You are a gentleman. Regards.GorgeCustersSabre (talk) 07:56, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]