Talk:High Hopes (Tim Scott McConnell song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move as proposed. bd2412 T 20:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

High Hopes (Bruce Springsteen song) → High Hopes (Tim Scott McConnell song) – Songs are supposed to be named for the original artists, aren't they? I don't see a specific mention of this at WP:NCM, but that's our usual practice, even if a cover version becomes more notable. --BDD (talk) 23:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Songs aren't always named for the original artists (e.g. "Wild Thing" [The Troggs song]) and songs before the recorded music era are rarely named for artists. The disambiguator should be the term most useful to readers even if it is not "true" to the first performer so the lack of a specific mention of this at WP:NCM is fine. —  AjaxSmack  04:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • somewhat Oppose - There has been an unofficial practice of using the original artist, but we are not bound by it and in this situation I think we should ignore that practice. I think the move would be a disservice to the reader and make the article more difficult to find; especially from external searches such as google. --Rushton2010 (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. My reasons for supporting are several
  1. That it keeps the time line.
  2. That Springsteen obvious learnt the song from McConnell.
  3. That McConnell wrote the song, and more than anybody else, this is McConnell's song.
  4. That using this criteria avoid 1000s of edit wars over who is more notable!
  5. There have been precedents to support this view, I can do the searches if you all require. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as per longstanding WP precedent and I also suggest a change to WP:NCM to follow along with this. I'll drop them a line. Red Slash 21:46, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Some songs in the recorded music era are disambiguated in other ways depending on how their notability derives, such as by year ("In the Still of the Night" [1956 song]), song genre ("When I'm Gone" [Motown song], "Put Yourself in My Place" [Motown song]), songwriters when there are numerous charted versions ("Walk On By" [Burt Bacharach and Hal David song] with over 10 charted versions), songwriters who are more notable than the performers (I'm in Love [Lennon–McCartney song])
While some of these are questionable ("Crazy" [Willie Nelson song] [which is still far more associated with Patsy Cline than Nelson], "Somewhere Out There" [James Horner song], etc.), most of these disambiguator choices are the best to direct a general audience to the right place.
Wikipedia should not be a slave to a single rule in this case. The disambiguator should be the phrase that best gets readers to where they want to go. —  AjaxSmack  20:20, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment only. With regards to Crazy and Somewhere Out There above, both are disambiguated by the songwriter, as proposed by this RM. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 23:10, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on High Hopes (Tim Scott McConnell song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is something fundamentally wrong with this article![edit]

3 Lines for the original author and singer of the son and 22 lines for a cover version that brought it back to the charts. It even begins by describing the Cover version and relegating the original artist to songwriter in the sidebar.

I think it should be done like "The Power of Love" (Jennifer Rush song) 80.208.71.137 (talk) 18:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:High_Hopes_(Tim_Scott_McConnell_song)&oldid=1200554664"