This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
There are many High Points. "High Point" should be directed to the disambiguous page, from there, users can select any one of many High Points, including "High Point Mountain, New Jersey"
This was taken care of a while ago.-Dmz5 09:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is about three different things (1) High Point as a geographical feature, (2) High Point State Park, and (3) the High Point Monument. They should be divided. I would propose the following:
1 - High Point (New Jersey) should redirect to Kittatinny Mountain, which I am presently revising and where a discussion of this promontory on KM will be added.
2 - The material on High Point State Park (which currently redirects to this article) ought to be sent over to the redirect article.
3 - A separate article should be created for the High Point Monument which would essentially be either (a) a stub and the content added to a High Point State Park article, (b) a redirect to the High Point State Park article or (c) a complete article on its own.
Consider and discuss. --JackTheVicar (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - There's no confusion in the article about which thing is being talked about at any one time. One medium-sized article is better than three small articles, especially when the subjects are so basically intertwingled. BMK (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
