This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
I came here looking for a discussion of the POV tag on the article and found none. Therefore, I'm removing the tag from the article. If you feel that the tag does, indeed, belong... then make your arguments for it here on the talk page as stated in the wikipedia guidelines. I don't see a POV problem within the article, if you do... please explain why and where on this talk page so we can work on it within a reasonable agreement. Just slapping a POV tag on an article without discussion is unacceptable. Cowicide 21:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While I agreed with its initial inclusion, I have significantly tweaked it and I believe it no longer is applicable. That's isn't to say it can't be improved. - RoyBoy800 16:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]