Talk:History of Middlesbrough F.C.

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal History of Middlesbrough F.C. is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Created article[edit]

Heya guys - hope this improves the Middlesbrough F.C. experience for those on Wikipedia. Just wondered what people think of creating sub-sections within this article for McClaren and Robson in particular. I think there'd be a lot of news about this stuff online to reference, and I reckon it could be relevant, particuarly when talking about the cup finals and runs. 82.39.158.11 20:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mannion, Hardwick and a missed opportunity (1919-1946)[edit]

Is it just me or does this section not make complete sense to a first time reader? It talks about the record of third place being expected to be beaten but for WW2 to intervene, but then mentioning before the war we finished third. But the club finished third before WW1, and only finished 4th (according to 1938-39 in English football) in 1938-39 so not only is it confusing but factually incorrect. Plus, that puts the whole of 1919-1938 without anything interesting happening (maybe nothing did), so it could use expansion if anyone has any information. --Simmo676 16:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ironopolis Picture[edit]

Is it really relevant to the article to display the winning Ironopolis side? They did break away from us but they have their own article on them with their details and this is about our side's history. --Simmo676 08:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Middlesbrough F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on History of Middlesbrough F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]