This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hollin Hills article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. ✅ At the time of this evaluation, the article has 56 references in correct format.
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. ✅ The article contains aspects of its history as a historic district with its mid-century modern architecture, along with present-day features and services rendered to community residents.
The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. ✅ The article contains many of the same elements found in articles for well-rated quality articles for major cities. This article contains information on transportation, political representation, civil services (e.g., police, fire) and environmental.
The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. ✅ The article has no known typographical errors or oddly described sections.
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. ✅ The article includes more than 50+ references and a See also section. Article includes an Infobox, a pull-out quote from the noted architect, and good photographic examples of homes in the community and well described beyond "this is a house here".
The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. ✅ The article is written in a manner of interest to those interested in its historic qualities, but also it includes aspects that are important to present-day residents. It does not speak like a marketing brochure and lays out the facts. Nearly all awards include cited references that are either directly from content dating back to the 1950's from the community's website, or directly from the sources (often trade magazines) when available online. In some cases, the trade magazine provides a more accurate dating of an award than the community resource (e.g., the 1981 vs 1982 Test of Time Award (1981 is more accurate; sourced from the AIA Virginia Society website as compared to the continual references to less accurate 1982 date in the community resources).
