Talk:Hollywood High (video game)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hollywood High (video game) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Hollywood High" video game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jack Marston (Red Dead) (5 participants)
Joshua Tomar (5 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants)
Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (13 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Archives[edit]

Man, I haven't touched this in a LONG time. I'm surprised someone edited this last month. Are there any public archives of Hollywood High scripts? (I did see a couple of good ones on Theatrix's web site... is it still up? Well, I lost my files.) --134.48.103.32 15:38 06 Apr 2006 (GMT)

I have doubts that this software is actually abandonware since nothing on the web mentions this, or has copies of the software. Anyone have proof of this? Rpgman456 15:51, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 January 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved. Andrewa (talk) 14:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

– The video game does not rise to the level of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 22:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support absolutely agree. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:33, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose due to proposal being based on pure opinion and offering no objective facts with which to evaluate the subjective claim that the video game "does not rise to the level of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC". I reserve the right to change my mind should objective and persuasive basis for this proposal be presented. Let me know. --В²C ☎ 00:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The game article has very poor sourcing—it's hard to argue that it's the best known "Hollywood High" when others exist. czar 20:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support "per subjective claim that the video game 'does not rise to the level of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC'", aka judgement. The real high school alone is more notable. — AjaxSmack 02:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support – agree that no primarytopic makes most sense here. Dicklyon (talk) 07:20, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Not a notable video game, let alone more notable than the other examples. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 12:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.