Talk:Hooters/Archives/2016

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hooters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080228100006/http://chronicle.augusta.com:80/stories/032201/met_085-5970.000.shtml to http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/032201/met_085-5970.000.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Numbers

In 2002 there were "restaurants in the Tampa Bay Area, Chicago metropolitan area, and one in Manhattan, New York...all other locations". That is not less than 5 in all. Yet the article then says that numbers grew from 1 to 425 between 2002 and 2006. That growth seems unlikely, particularly given the inconsistency.Royalcourtier (talk) 04:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Stephanie J

Is Stephanie J notable enough, to be mentioned in tab article? If so, it needs to be mentioned, why, please.--NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for removing these sections of the text. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 03:08, 12 October 2016 (UTC)