Talk:How Deep Is Your Love (Sean Paul song)

Merge

Given the relative absence of information about this song and its limited release, its looking like it will never grow beyond a stub! Can i suggest per WP:NMUSIC it is merged into the parent album Tomahawk Technique. Charting aside there's a distinct lack of information that warrants an independent article. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 14:56, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Genre 'Sourcing'

You cannot undo a revision basing it off a principle yet ignoring the principle when you see fit (why do you need a source for it being classified as 'reggae fusion' but yet there is no source for why it is classified as 'pop'). The song contains elements of dancehall and pop (predominantly pop but still) hence by definition, it would therefore also be classified under the genre of reggae fusion.

1. The genre of a song is subjective at best. You cannot source something such as that. And a source is not the be all and end all. If an artiste makes a 'rock' song but says in interviews that he classifies it as 'rap', do we therefore put the genre as 'rap', even though the song does not fall under that genre, simply because the artiste says it's a rap song?

2. Even if sourcing a reference to the specific genre of the song was absolutely necessary, no reference has been put for why it is classified as 'pop'. Since there is no reference for that, should we therefore remove that as well? Exactly, read up on the genre before you simply remove it because it wasn't sourced. The song falls under what is considered 'reggae fusion' (a mixing of elements of dancehall/reggae with other genres). Sean Paul's heavy use of Jamaican dialect (patios) is the cornerstone element of a dancehall/reggae song. What makes this a fusion is that he used a pop instrumental/beat as the framework of the song. --Sixpacz (talk) 08:20, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on How Deep Is Your Love (Sean Paul song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5whW1753d?url=http://www.radio1.gr/music/forthcoming_uk_singles.htm to http://www.radio1.gr/music/forthcoming_uk_singles.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)