Talk:Hudson v. McMillian

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I freakin' dare someone to defend Thomas' and Scalia's ruling in thin case. -Mark

Since it was a dissent, it doesn't count as a ruling. What I do find funny is that, by quoting Frank Easterbrook's memorable line, he managed to get Space: 1999 into the U.S. Supreme Court Reports — a privilege denied to Star Trek and Star Wars AFAIK. Daniel Case 05:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]