Talk:Huel

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Too much marketing and PR puff?[edit]

Just by reading it and following recent changes, I realized that there might be a "little too much" marketing and PR puff for Huel. I was visiting the site to check for company information since it is an interesting startup, also from a company and online marketing success point of view. However, I think this might be an article that is a little bit too repetitive covering the Value Preposition of Huel.

Let's discuss how to improve this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihan187 (talk • contribs) 10:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like significant fluff was removed in October 2018. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It still feels like it is written like an advertisement. I'm suggesting the "advert" tag (whatever it is called). --Emilhem (talk) 19:51, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bad reviews[edit]

The reviews are mostly negative. Huel is not meant to be without lumps, or to replace all of your meals, but to assist you in a better diet. It's not meant to taste amazingly like your favorite burgher as it's based on plants. You can't make a tasty beef burger from plants, at least no yet. TudorTulok (talk) 14:03, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That last part: Are you saying it's impossible? 66.210.249.135 (talk) 17:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Black Edition and version 3.0[edit]

It would be nice to mention the Black Edition and the evolution of all of the versions. TudorTulok (talk) 14:04, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Huel seems to have changed a lot since the wave of cited reviews ended in 2017. It would be nice to have less outdated info. 66.210.249.135 (talk) 17:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Huel-product-image.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:06, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Products Section[edit]

I understand the current product section is mainly first referenced, however, instead of removing it entirely can it be cut down for the time being? I’d like the opportunity to develop the section with secondary referencing.DrJosephCowan (talk) 00:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Necessity of 'criticisms' listed?[edit]

I think the controversy cited is absolutely valid, but what are the reviews passing as 'criticism' in the 'Controversy and Criticisms' section doing there? Those are just negative editorial reviews. I would think criticism of the company itself would belong there (blatant hypocrisies, environmental concerns, etc), not individual opinions of the product itself. If that were to be the standard, why not list critical reviews on every company's page? Neuropsia (talk) 12:36, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I agree that putting that food tastes bland in a Wikipedia doesn't make sense. Thus, I've removed it. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 12:38, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]