Talk:Hugh Bourne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old talk[edit]

To explain my "citation needed" edit of this page.

While some readings of the various sources, such as Kendall's 1919 history, page 18, speaks of Hugh Bourne's changing the format of services and laying down rules, this was in the context of open-air preaching to evangelise the outsiders. He does not seem to have changed the regular Sunday worship in the same way.

Bourne changed the formality back to what Wesley had done in going outside the walls of the building.

There is, however, evidence that the CAmp Meeting format (Kendall p. 18) did not always apply. For example, Dyson (Wesleyan Methodism in the Leek Circuit) says of Methodism coming to Gratton, "About 1811, 3 poor men from Harriseahead preached in the fields and lanes about Gratton ..." until a church woman invited them to use her house for preaching. A modern example is that the same person may preach on Sunday in a Church using the 1662 Book of Common Prayer, having preached on the street the previous day in a totally informal way.

If the phrase "fit for purpose" comes from one of the recent histories of Primitive Methodism, there ought to be a reference since it is a citation. If it is the words of a Wiki Editor, it risks being an interpretation unless some reference can be given to a recognised history

There is some indication in the final paragraph of Ashworth ch. III of changes Bourne made - adding a prayer meeting after the preaching meeting, and variety into the Class Meeting (which was not a normal Service). Even this does not justify to me the "not fit for purpose" phrase.

Robert of Ramsor (talk) 23:22, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hugh Bourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hugh Bourne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]