A fact from Humphrey Stafford (died 1442) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 October 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that a 15th-century English gentleman was called "Humphrey Stafford with the Silver Hand" because of a prosthesis he wore, perhaps having lost his limb in a "bellicose engagement"?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
GA review
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
I realize that we are at a great length of time from this man's life but are there more important details/life events that could be added? I am concerned at the shortness of this article.
The content is almost too focused (if that is possible).
I can provide more context to his life, etc- That might help assuage the issue of article length too? O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 11:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Are there more images available of Stafford's various holdings?
Good idea- ironically, it was the shortness of the article that dissuaded me from overloading it with images. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 11:15, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I did a general read-through. Passing the article to GA-status is on hold just pending these last few items:
I found a mistake in one of the Wikilinks. "arras" links to the city of the same name in France, but I think the intent is to link it to Tapestry as in Arras (disambiguation).
I think the wording and linking of Berkeley inheritance was later claimed should be adjusted - there are so many words in red that it is a bit disconcerting. Also, which Thomas, Lord Berkeley is being referred to in that particular paragraph? (Is there perhaps already a Wikipedia article about this individual, but maybe under a different name?) Shearonink (talk) 00:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This review is only on hold pending the last three items above: 1)arras/WIkilink, 2)the redlinked inheritance phrase, and 3)which Lord Berkeley exactly? Shearonink (talk)
Comment: I'm sorry, I just now did one last read-through and have found a few errors (mostly minor punctuation/grammar issues...with the exception of a pesky mystery man...):
brother, John on the King's Council. (missing a comma, should be)-> brother, John, on the King's council
...and by 1403, he had been retained... has a comma too many. I think the sense would be better if ...and by 1403 had been retained
in 1406, and Ralph continued serving... I'm sorry but just who is this "Ralph"? Is Ralph one of Stafford's - probably many - names? I know present members of the British royal family seem to have a long string of names as their Official Name.
and the whole Berkeley inheritance claimed. is missing a verb, should be "and the whole Berkeley inheritance was claimed" (by the way, big thumbs-up for your recrafting of this section.) Shearonink (talk) 15:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done No problem, Shearonink, let me know if you find anything else -But see my edit-summary for the full confession! O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 16:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.