Talk:Hurley (album)

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Genres[edit]

If no one has publicly heard the music, should there really be a defined genre or two? 74.216.108.73 (talk) 02:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added a level 2 header to this discussion. You are correct. Genres are supposed to be referenced by a reliable secondary source (just like every other piece of information on Wikipedia). In this case, there have been no reviews of Hurley that we're made aware of, so the genre becomes an editor's WP:OPINION and is unverifiable as accurate. The genre(s) should be removed and not listed until a reliable article or review mentions the album's genre. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 04:33, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews[edit]

before you post "professional reviews" from places like "sputnikmusic" maybe look up the term "professional"

pretty much no one reputable has reviewed this yet, it's embarrassing enough to have to post/care what rolling stone thinks about weezer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.57.203.145 (talk • contribs)

According to WP:ALBUM/REVSIT, SputnikMusic is acceptable as a professional review so long as the review was written by staff, not user contributors. I've also seen reviews by Spin and Chicago Tribune. Obviously there will be more reviews coming out. I just double checked all the links of the reviews you removed, and they're perfectly acceptable in accordance with the guidelines on WP:ALBUMS, etc. So I will revert your edit. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 18:19, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted that the Rock Sound review in the ratings template is not the official review from the publication. It's more of a track by track preview. All of their reviews have ratings out of ten. Fezmar9 (talk) 01:42, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The review from Ultimate Guitar's Staff is actually 10/10, whereas we have the average of user reviews listed here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.177.48.19 (talk) 16:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Change the Photo[edit]

Who is that fat guy from the photo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.26.158.229 (talk) 13:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Garcia, best known as Hurley from Lost. It's the actual album cover. --RaygunShaun (talk) 23:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hurley (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.spinner.com/2010/08/09/weezer-hurley-album-cover/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140915012320/http://www.hitsdailydouble.com/sales/salescht.cgi to http://www.hitsdailydouble.com/sales/salescht.cgi

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hurley (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]