Talk:I'll Be Gone (Linkin Park song)

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Linkin Park (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linkin Park, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Linkin ParkWikipedia:WikiProject Linkin ParkTemplate:WikiProject Linkin ParkLinkin Park articles

Spectrum claims song first[edit]

The band Spectrum already took it first since they released it in 1971 before Linkin Park did in 2012. Look up this page: I'll Be Gone (Spectrum song). You'll see it and change it eventually. Skylar3214 5:27, 18 April 2014

What is the point of this statement exactly? SilentDan297 talk 19:58, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. Linkin Park wasn't really the first rock band to write the song. It was all Spectrum's idea to write it down in 1971 before Linkin Park did in 2012. Why is it titled as "I'll Be Gone (Spectrum song)" in the first place? This calls for a redirect from "I'll Be Gone" to "I'll Be Gone (Linkin Park song)", and then from "I'll Be Gone (Spectrum song)" to "I'll Be Gone". Skylar3214 11:53, 20 April 2014

If you believe that a move should be done, then request a move of multiple pages. I personally believe that due to the recognition between artists, that It should stay the same, Spectrum have barely charted and made any cultural impact, where as Linkin Park are a huge award winning band and have made impacts on the face of nu metal and music, all together making them much more notable, also the pages related to Spectrum appear to be mostly original research and have very few references to back up its information. However its better to request a move to get the opinions of other Wikipedians to get a fair vote. SilentDan297 talk 10:18, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:I'll Be Gone (Linkin Park song)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Start class:

Y A reasonably complete infobox
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
Y A track listing
Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current single; a band navbox is insufficient)
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C-class:

Y All the start class criteria
Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Y A full list of personnel including guest musicians
Y Reliable independent in-line references supporting claims
Y A casual reader should learn something about the album

B-class:

Y All the C-class criteria
Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources
- Some claims do not have independent references e.g. chart positions in Melbourne, Sydney & Brisbane; cover versions; Triple M 2006 Essential countdown position.
Y No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
Y No obvious omissions, but also no obvious extraneous information – such as "trivia"

Evaluation based on WikiProject Albums assessment scale. Please update this list when the article meets any of the above criteria, changing the article's class assessment as appropriate. Self-assessed, and hence may be biased, by – Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:42, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 05:42, 30 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)