Talk:I'm Like a Bird

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 2007[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.


Since the name of this is a proper noun, all words but "a" should be capitalized. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD#Capitalization. I  (said) (did) 11:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - per nom ~ JohnnyMrNinja {talk} 17:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 02:20, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's technically not true. Articles aren't capitalized in titles, but neither are prepositions, and "like" is a preposition here. That said, for better or for worse, longer prepositions such as "about" are often capitalized in titles (see, for example, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding). Dekimasuよ! 07:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My grammar is a bit rusty, (it is the summer) but how is "like" a preposition? Doesn't it describe "I"? I  (said) (did) 07:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you check dictionary.com, you can find this one under definition 6 in the first entry, and the example sentence shows pretty well that it's the same meaning as the one used in this title. "I'm like a bird" has the same grammatical structure here as "I'm under the bridge" or "I'm at the bank". Dekimasuよ! 07:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well I never. Your right. However it still looks funny. I  (said) (did) 09:25, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, I think the title personally looks better with a capital "Like", but that doesn't follow Wikipedia's naming conventions for songs (Maybe we need a policy change). Also, the only proper noun in the title is "Bird". --musicpvm 18:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My argument was that as a title of a song the whole thing was. But since Like is technically a preposition here, and less than five letters, it shouldn't be capitalized. So since I was wrong, what is proper procedure? Remove the tag and this pages entry at Requested moves? I still think it looks silly i (said) (did) 20:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 19:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Importance.[edit]

Can someone rate the importance of this article? I just want to know what this article would be classified under in Wikipedia standards. Garry says OK (talk) 10:50, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neither song has importance on WP SONGS. Tbh®tchTalk © Happy Holidays 00:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move - August 2012[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus to move. Cúchullain t/c 17:26, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


I'm Like a BirdI'm like a Bird – Above discussion has enough consensus, "like" is a preposition here. Similar case like "Moves like Jagger" and "Someone like You" (Adele song). Silvergoat (talkcontrib) 17:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. 'like' is preferred over 'Like' as a 4 letter prep. Zarcadia (talk) 10:48, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. "I'm like a Bird" looks like hell. I would argue that "like" here is serving as a direct adverb of the verb "am", or that "am like" is being used as a participle. In either case, "Like" is properly capitalized. I also note that the NY Times, Washington Post, and Associated Press all prefer "I'm Like a Bird". --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 12:55, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Nope, "like" certainly is a preposition in this context and functions equivalently to, say, "with". Although I admit that people seem less inclined to uncapitalize "like" than "with" ("I'm with a Bird" would be uncontroversial). This might be because the word can also function as a verb in other contexts and is therefore often seen capitalized. Jafeluv (talk) 13:44, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I'm Like a Bird. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I'm Like a Bird. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]