Talk:I'm Your Boy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Absurd claims from non-reliable sources[edit]

I removed the absurd assertion by Soompi (a non-reliable source we shouldn't be using for anything) that TVXQ topped the charts first with Tree, as it's absolutely not true, per here. I also seriously doubt Shinee is the second Korean male group to ever chart the Oricon weeklies, either. So don't use Soompi - they aren't a reliable news site, they are a fan site. Shinyang-i (talk) 02:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Boys Meet U (song)[edit]

Although this single charted and sold well, it does not appear to be notable enough for a standalone article (See WP:NSONG). Significant coverage from third-party reliable sources is required to show notability. Per WP:SONGS, most songs do not merit an article and "A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". The article about the single is short, and what little info is there will fit in the album article. Random86 (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with 3 2 1 (song)[edit]

See above discussion. This single lacks significant coverage and the article is very short. Random86 (talk) 06:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose 321 charted in a national chart (at #7) and so meets WP:NSONG #1. The programme it is the theme song for also seems to be notable. We also need to take into account the linguistic difficulties of finding reviews in Japanese. It deserves its own article. Boleyn (talk) 07:33, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Lucky Star (Shinee song)[edit]

See above. The single charted, but lacks significant coverage from third party sources. Random86 (talk) 06:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and

Done Klbrain (talk) 23:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on I'm Your Boy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]