Talk:I Can't Date Jesus

God opposes homosexuality, but not celestial personocracy

celestial personocracy: The claim that personhood and at least one bearer of it, is precosmic, cosmogonous, an agent of anti-physics during the lifespan of the universe, and the center of all causality. A claim based on parentally taught tradition; and not on observations neither mathematical formulas organized cohesively. Metalogically personhood is an informational process; because the most important criteria of personhood (study term) are: intellect (thinking ability) and sometimes empathy (a limbic system and dopaminergic pathways are required; even if they are not biological but based on artificial neural networks. No person is a philosophical simple because they have memories.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:411E:EE00:F95F:E6BD:F74F:AA2B (talk • contribs) 18:31, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Criticism

The author has his personal problems, and is biased not to analyze if personhood is more fundamental than the universe (hasn't even care to read all possible related articles). One's sexuality has a major impact on the individual; but that doesn't create god. If your sexuality justifies god, then god is not god, but the quality of your sexuality is god.

Confusing metaphysical questions, with ones of sexual conduct is totally erroneous; it's a layperson's common sense. Common sense, is not a wise guide to ask questions about cosmomechanics (how the cosmos works).

Theists deny that fMRI data which prove that lesions in specific brain regions (read: Brodmann areas, neuroscience) cause corresponding impairment to a specific range of conducts (most of the times different per region of brain lesion, and totally specific; watch all lectures of Robert Sapolsky, neuroendocrinologist at Stanford University.

So it's proven that we think with our brains and not with the soul. A dead brain suffers from overall lesion.

Also the author hasn't read the mistake of René Descartes. René Descartes shifted the thinking center from brain to soul (his pineal gland mistake was a different one; in neuroscience he was a clown). Shifting the thinking center doesn't cancel its mechanics. Humans exhibit some behavioral patterns. Study ethology, which usually but not necessarily focuses more on animals. Ethology might be superior and a hypernym of psychology, because it's based more on data than interpretations which are usually imagined and biased.

The "center of thought", even if it's biological (brain) or mythological (soul) it still exhibits the same informational interactions.

So the author claims that hell and heaven are two parallel universes, which have no cosmomechanics; some kind of weird physics. Randomness is not how hell and paradise; they work with specific normality, some form of "theistic physics". Their physics being non random, it can be defined specifically; except if they are taught within some culture, lies. And people there think without brains; even if we know that brain lesions have an impact on the erroneously supposed free will. Because from data we know that 40% of people convicted for capital murder, suffered legions on the frontal lobe which controls our reactions and emotions (read: Phineas Gage, anterior cingulate cortex).

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:411E:EE00:F95F:E6BD:F74F:AA2B (talk • contribs) 18:31, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Beyoncé: Beyond C is D... and all the rest letters; thus don't get stuck, and search it more!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:411E:EE00:F95F:E6BD:F74F:AA2B (talk • contribs) 18:31, 28 August 2019 (UTC)