A fact from Ian Meadows (archaeologist) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 June 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Ian Meadows discovered both the Anglo-Saxon Pioneer helmet and the first conclusive evidence for viticulture in Roman Britain?
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
I am still not seeing how this person satisfies WP:GNG. He seems to be notable for one event - the Pioneer Helmet discovery - and we already have an article for that. Is there any policy-based reason why this should not be a redirect? I'm not even sure it should exist at all but I'd settle for a redirect for now as I suspect that there will be obituaries at some time in the future. - Sitush (talk) 19:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Although he is indeed associated with a notable event—the discovery of the Wollaston helmet—that is the byproduct of 40 years of archaeological experience. Indeed, non-helmet publications account for nearly half of those listed on his page, and, were one to read the two cited references, one would not find a single mention of the helmet. --Usernameunique (talk) 23:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate that he has written about other stuff. Merely writing about things is not grounds for notability. Look, I am more than happy to see a decent biographical article retained here but I'm a bit doubtful whether it meets GNG. This is not intended to be an adversarial discussion. - Sitush (talk) 23:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea why Category:Publishing appears for this article but it would seem to be some sort of transclusion. Honestly, academics are published - is there really any justification for it, wherever it may come from? Has hepublished anything (a journal, for example) or is he in fact an academic writer who has been published? - Sitush (talk) 23:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It was being transcluded from {{Closed access}}, which I've just fixed. – Joe (talk) 07:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I've never seen that template used in my 200k edits/10 years here! I see and use {{subscription required}} a lot but the assumption - nor just mine - has always been that if a subscription isn't required then the content is openly available. How odd. - Sitush (talk) 08:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
