Talk:Ice Warrior

Doctor Who Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

press report[edit]

this is quite spooky. i was in the pub last evening making predictions about what happens in season 3 and i decided that the ice warriors could well be introduced in s3s1. is the paper channeling from my brainwaves? Morwen - Talk 10:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And would it then be *boom! boom!* psychic paper? --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 11:38, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation box[edit]

Hey, especially in light of the recent press rumors, think the Warriors should get a navigation box like those of the Daleks and Cybermen? --71.139.18.66 19:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure they have enough stories? Someone suggested it for the Sontarans recently, they didn't really have enough. Morwen - Talk 12:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Current Picture?[edit]

I know that a lot of the time Ice Warriors appear in armour, rather then showing skin. However I am sure that we could find a picture that features a group of Ice Warriors with a mixture of them wearing armour and perhaps without the helment to highlight their reptilian appearance. I don't want to spark a reversion war by simply changing the picture so I am going to open it to debate. Dr noire (talk • contribs) 14:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Name[edit]

Isd there any information, canon or not, about what the Ice warriors call themselves - apart from the single reference to Izixyr using the "Ice Warrior" term? Totnesmartin 11:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Color[edit]

I believe that these pictures of Ice Warriors in color that I uploaded should be the ones used on this page. If anyone wish to revert this, please say it here first, and give a good reason for why the black/white images are better than the color ones. Xavius, the Satyr Lord (talk) 10:33, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The current ones? I don't really like them... I think that they are really... for look of a better word, it looks like someone squashed them. I personally liked that other one we had... the other colour one, with the Ice warrior in front of that ship(?)... what ever happenned to that one?

I understand your feelings, though. We should have a colour picture. I guess these ones will do for now... until someone finds a better colour picture from the actual TV series. And please, let us avoid a revert war. Let's simply discuss possible alternatives here. They current pictures will do for now, as I said earlier, but... I don't think they should become our permanent Ice Warrior picture. Temporary place-holder, I guess. Comics (talk) 07:13, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ice Warrior. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130706193745/http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~ecl6nb/OnTarget/1990/mission/misfacts.htm to http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~ecl6nb/OnTarget/1990/mission/misfacts.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]