This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is ridiculously hagiographic. After reading the whole thing it is not exactly clear how he is notable. It needs to focus more of facts and how he interacts his society and less on just saying how brilliant he is. Ashmoo (talk) 11:02, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Many of the statements on this page are currently being tested and discussed, and they appear to be fabricated. See https://twitter.com/TheLexTimes/status/1171136975677480960 for a thread that includes: no evidence of a Presidential Scholar award, an invalid patent number given, as well as nobody who can confirm that Iddris has worked at any of the claimed companies. Tmcw (talk) 02:34, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Several edits that have added details about the now-retracted Forbes article and Sandu’s own corrections have been removed by anonymous IP-based editors. It’s too much drama for my taste but a more seasoned Wikipedian might want to step in. Tmcw (talk) 17:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like several accounts - Wmeclientserv and Wewerewildandfree were registered for the express purpose of keeping the the retractions out of this post, and before that a few edits from a Los-Angeles area based IP were doing the same. This slow-motion edit war isn't crossing the three revert rule boundary out of sheer slowness, but it has seen six suspicious edits to keep Iddris's point of view clear and remove cited information. Tmcw (talk) 02:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
